| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Seneca Aurun
Viziam
Amarr Empire
0
   |
Posted - 2013.05.20 23:11:00 -
[1] - Quote
Katarina Musana wrote:
The "current" war, as you like to call it, may well be on the Republic's hands. I see no need to argue that point when there's a bigger issue.
The Reclaiming is purely an Amarrian construct. Being at war and enacting a Reclaiming do not go hand-in-hand. The "current Reclaiming" is on the Empire's hands, not ours. And as long as the Empire continues with its proclamations and attempts at Reclaiming us, there will be no opportunity for peace. So, the continuance of war between us is, actually, on the Empire's hands.
Ball's in your court, dear.
The Battle of Colelie puts lie to your words. It is rather clear that peace with the Republic is impossible, even for it's own allies, on any other terms than complete submission any time the Republic chooses to make demands in the name of Tribal 'honor' . |
Seneca Aurun
Viziam
Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 02:01:00 -
[2] - Quote
Katarina Musana wrote:
No, it really doesn't. First, there had been continued attempts at negotiation with the Federation, all of which failed.
And certainly violence is the appropriate response to a dispute with an ally.
Quote:Second, no statement has been made by the Tribal Council as to the exact reasons for the battle at Colelie, so any speculation as to the reason it occurred and whether or not there really was justification is just that, speculation.
The Republic stated the intentions of it's incursion into Federation space quite clearly. Assuming some other hidden justification is pure speculation on your part.
|
Seneca Aurun
Viziam
Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 15:05:00 -
[3] - Quote
Katarina Musana wrote:
Would you care to show me where they made this statement? I have not seen any official statement from the Tribal Council or Shakor on the matter.
According to the reports Admiral Leralduin Olf demanded free passage through Federation territory to seize the accused shooter in the Caille incident.
Due presumably to the failure of the Federation to submit unconditionally to the Republics demands.
Apologies, I meant due to the 'breakdown in negotiations' between the Republic and the Federation. |
| |
|